did big banju make a marketing mistake?
- Emmanuel Umahi
- May 15
- 3 min read

A few weeks ago, the streets of X (formerly known as Twitter) were lit with chatter about Big Banju’s new single, Ada. From gifs to memes and quote tweets dripping in sarcasm or admiration, the name “Big Banju” was on more timelines than most news headlines. But as the dust settles, one question remains—why hasn’t all this buzz translated into streams?
The Buzz Was Real
Let’s get this straight: Banju got people talking. And that in itself is no small feat in today’s chaotic digital world. The artist dropped a paid ad campaign with short, colorful vertical snippets of the Ada video. The videos—optimized for mobile and made for virality—found their way into timelines, trending threads, and even random group chats.
It was funny, it was dramatic, and it got people laughing. Some were convinced the trailer was a parody. Others praised the creativity. A few even declared him the new face of Gen Z Highlife. Banju had succeeded in what many artists fail to do: get attention.
But was that attention enough?
The Numbers Tell a Different Story
Despite all the buzz, music platforms told a less exciting tale. Ada barely scratched the surface of most editorial playlists. Daily streams trickled rather than surged. There was no visible spike on Apple Music charts. Spotify was quiet. Audiomack, even quieter.
What went wrong?
The Disconnect Between Virality and Conversion
Marketing in music has changed. Viral doesn’t always mean valuable—especially if your virality doesn’t lead people to your music. Banju’s video snippets may have sparked conversation, but they didn’t drive curiosity about the actual song. The trailers were entertaining, but not necessarily representative of the track’s sound or vibe. For some, it felt like a TikTok skit, not a single launch.
Worse still, there was no link in sight. A lot of the conversations on X didn’t include streaming links, download prompts, or even a pinned tweet to the actual music. So while the content traveled far, the conversion funnel was broken.
Could a Community Have Helped?
Absolutely.
One major missing piece was an engaged community—people who could quote-tweet with links, share the song, post reviews, or even create user-generated content around Ada. Organic push remains king in Nigeria’s music ecosystem, and Banju didn’t seem to have a strong street team or digital tribe.
It’s one thing to run ads. It’s another to back it with a community that amplifies and extends it authentically. The buzz, though real, lacked weight without a core of believers behind it.
What Could Be Done Differently?
1. Call-to-Action is Key: Every post, every trailer, every tweet should drive people somewhere—preferably to the music.
2. Platform-Optimized Content: Banju nailed the format with vertical trailers, but they didn’t offer a sound bite that made people want more. 30-second colorful trailers are great—but they need a musical hook too.
3. Leverage Community: Creatives, fans, micro-influencers—even friends. Having a group of people organically tweeting about the music (not just the promo) could have made a huge difference.
4. Storytelling Matters: Who is Ada? What’s the story behind the track? A short story or emotional hook could have bridged the gap between casual watchers and loyal listeners.
Final Thoughts
Big Banju didn’t flop. Let’s be clear on that. He got people to say his name, and in a world where attention is currency, that’s a major win. But if the goal was to push Ada into the ears of more listeners, then the strategy missed a few crucial beats.
Virality is a spark. But in music, you need firewood, oxygen, and direction to build a lasting flame.
Hopefully, Banju takes the lessons from this rollout and uses them to refine the next one. Because one thing is certain—the people are watching. Now it’s time to make them listen.
Comments